
点阵微针射频治疗腋臭的临床效果:附91例报告
Clinical observation on the treatment of axillary osmidrosis with fractional microneedle radiofrequency: A report of 91 cases
目的 观察点阵微针射频治疗腋臭的疗效和安全性,为腋臭个体化治疗提供参考。方法 选取2022年1月至2023年9月东莞市滨海湾中心医院采用点阵微针射频治疗的腋臭患者91例,6个月后随访,观察有效率,分析不同腋臭分级、性别、年龄及体质指数(BMI)患者的疗效差异,同时观察复发率、患者满意度及并发症情况。 结果 治疗后6个月,有效率为75.82%(69/91),复发率为5.79%(4/69)。不同腋臭分级中,轻度患者有效率低于中度和重度患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而中度与重度患者有效率相当(P>0.05)。不同性别、年龄、BMI的患者疗效差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。患者满意度为68.79%。并发症包括表皮烫伤5例、皮下结节8例,均1~2个月后自然消退,上肢皮肤麻木感5例,对症处理后1个月左右症状消退。 结论 点阵微针射频治疗腋臭具有安全、有效的特点,中重度患者治疗效果更明显。
Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of fractional microneedle radiofrequency in the treatment of axillary osmidrosis. Methods Ninty-one patients with axillary osmidrosis who were treated with fractional microneedle radiofrequency were enrolled at Dongguan Binhai-wan Central Hospital from January 2022 to September 2023. The effective rate was observed 6 months after the treatment, and the differences in the efficacy among patients with different axillary osmidrosis grades, gender, age and body mass index (BMI) were analyzed. Meanwhile, the recurrence rate and complications were observed. Results Six months after the treatment, the effective rate was 75.82% (69/91), and the recurrence rate was 5.79% (4/69). Among patients with different grades of axillary odor, the effective rate in mild patients was lower than that in moderate and severe patients (P<0.05), while the difference between moderate and severe groups was not significant (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in efficacy among gender, age, and BMI (P>0.05). The patient satisfaction rate was 68.79%. Epidermal burns and subcutaneous nodules were observed in 5 and 8 cases, respectively. But the symptoms subsided after 1~2 months without treatment. Numbness of arm occurred in 5 cases, and the symptoms disappeared one month after symptomatic treatment. Conclusions Fractional microneedle radiofrequency is safe and effective for axillary osmidrosis, especially for moderate and severe osmidrosis.
腋臭 / 点阵微针射频 / 疗效 {{custom_keyword}} /
axillary osmidrosis / fractional microneedle radiofrequency / efficacy {{custom_keyword}} /
表1 不同类别患者术后6个月疗效比较Table 1 Comparison of therapeutic effects 6 months after the treatment |
分类 | 总例数 | 治愈 | 显效 | 无效 | 有效率(%) | χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | 0.14 | 0.706 | |||||
女 | 59 | 12 | 32 | 15 | 74.58 | ||
男 | 32 | 5 | 20 | 7 | 78.13 | ||
年龄(岁) | 1.57 | 0.456 | |||||
18~27 | 46 | 10 | 26 | 10 | 78.26 | ||
28~37 | 32 | 3 | 19 | 10 | 68.75 | ||
≥38 | 13 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 84.62 | ||
BMI | 0.60 | 0.741 | |||||
过轻 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 85.71 | ||
正常 | 63 | 11 | 37 | 15 | 76.19 | ||
超重/肥胖 | 21 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 71.43 | ||
腋臭分级 | 26.77 | <0.01 | |||||
轻度 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10.00 | ||
中度 | 17 | 3 | 12 | 2 | 88.24 | ||
重度 | 64 | 14 | 39 | 11 | 82.81 |
[1] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
田小磊, 周荣新, 高凤, 等. 腋臭外科手术治疗概况[J]. 临床皮肤科杂志, 2023, 52(10):633-637.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
陈玉平, 于秋月, 戴耕武, 等. 黄金微针与微创手术治疗腋臭的疗效比较[J]. 中国美容医学, 2022, 31(5):61-63.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
李晟, 傅荣, 泽仁青措, 等. 黄金微针与皮瓣法微创手术治疗腋臭的疗效观察[J]. 中国美容医学, 2017, 26(12):17-20.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
Axillary osmidrosis is caused by excessive secretion of apocrine, which causes an acrid odor and extreme social embarrassment. Elimination of the apocrine glands by a radical surgical procedure is known as the best solution for axillary osmidrosis; however, it is often accompanied by marked complications. The purpose of this study was to seek a more effective surgical procedure by comparing the various preexisting subcutaneous apocrine gland elimination methods using four parameters: odor, scar, immobilization period, and other surgical complications such as hematoma, seroma, flap necrosis, and wound dehiscence. From March 1995 to March 2000, a total of 189 patients underwent surgery for axillary osmidrosis via manual subdermal shavings (N = 117), liposuction curettage (N = 32), CO2 laser vaporization (N = 18), and ultrasonic aspiration (N = 22). Of these procedures, manual shaving had the lowest recurrence rate for malodor. However, the disadvantages of this procedure included wide scar, a long immobilization period, and moderate cases of surgical complications. CO2 laser vaporization had results similar to manual shaving except for a clinically higher recurrence rate. Liposuction had advantages such as small invisible scars, a short-term immobilization period, and the least number of surgical complications, but it had a high rate of dissatisfaction in postoperative malodor (46.9%). Ultrasonic aspiration offered better results such as short surgical scar and relatively low recurrence rate, but it had some surgical complications (3 of 44 axillas). Therefore, removal of subcutaneous apocrine glands by manual subdermal shaving is the treatment of choice for axillary osmidrosis, with a low recurrence rate (7.7%). Other adjuvant procedures were effective in achieving short scars and low surgical complications, but there was dissatisfaction in the rate of recurrence.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
中国肥胖问题工作组. 中国成人超重和肥胖症预防与控制指南(节录)[J]. 营养学报, 2004, 26(1):1-4.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
邹奔, 高崧瀛, 焉伟杰, 等. 黄金微针射频法与微创搔刮法腋臭根治术治疗腋臭的疗效对比[J]. 中国美容医学, 2022, 31(11):27-30.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
高美艳, 郭伟楠, 李冰, 等. 等离子激光术和小切口吸刮术治疗腋臭的疗效及安全性比较[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志, 2021, 35(1):106-109.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
魏琼玲, 刘厚广, 李峥, 等. 负压和非负压黄金微针射频治疗腋臭的临床疗效与安全性比较[J]. 中国医疗美容, 2022, 12(1):3-6.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
谭雅心, 刘建盟, 段祉屹, 等. 微波治疗腋窝多汗症及腋臭疗效及安全性研究[J]. 临床皮肤科杂志, 2019, 48(10):632-636.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
刘影, 张硕, 杨玲, 等. 黄金微针射频治疗腋臭83例疗效分析[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志, 2020, 34(10):1209-1213.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
张倩倩, 唐隽. 微针点阵射频治疗腋臭症的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 临床皮肤科杂志, 2019, 48(7):444-447.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
裴会乐, 刘益民, 代涛, 等. BodyTite黄金微针射频治疗腋臭的临床观察[J]. 中国中西医结合皮肤性病学杂志, 2019, 18(4):338-340.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
姚卫君, 张建文, 刘林嶓. BodyTite黄金微针射频治疗腋臭的临床研究[J]. 中国美容医学, 2018, 27(3):29-31.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[19] |
李菊妹, 刘小舒, 王屋金, 等. 腋臭手术范围与疗效相关性的初步探讨[J]. 中华整形外科杂志, 2005, 21(3):239-240.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[20] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[21] |
吴颖, 黄绿萍, 房林, 等. 负压辅助微波治疗腋窝多汗症及腋臭的并发症分析[J]. 中华整形外科杂志, 2021(10):1146-1151.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |